The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged, even though the Defendant did not have threatened the victim with knife that knife knife knife knife.

B. The sentence of an unreasonable sentencing (three million won of a fine) of the lower court is too heavy.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court regarding the assertion of mistake of facts, the Defendant’s act constitutes a crime of intimidation against the victim, and thus, the Defendant’s allegation is not acceptable.

① At the investigative agency and court of the court below, the victim told the Defendant to use the phone at the time of the instant case, i.e., “the Defendant died of her,” and she collected the Defendant’s fire, but she took the Defendant’s attitude as her own drinking, she took the Defendant’s own drinking, and she took the knife knife inside the knife, and she took the knife inside the knife, and she took the knife knife, and she took the knife knife from the Defendant in the course of stopping the Defendant and stopping the Defendant, and the latter sound took the knife from the Defendant’s hand, and the police who called the knife’s report by the her mother.

② At the court of the court below, F stated in the court below that, as the sound was cut to the knicker at the time of the instant case, the victim said that “the Defendant was flicker and knicker,” the knicker’s knicker was flicker, and that the knicker was flicker’s knicker’s knicker’s knicker, and that the knick was 5 to 6cm at the time

(3) The victim was in service in the place of this case.