Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 13 million.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On August 30, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million with a fine of KRW 1.5 million with a fine of KRW 1.5 million with the same crime at the Suwon District Court on December 13, 2018.

【Criminal Facts】

On February 26, 2020, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol of 0.081% of blood alcohol concentration at around 05:48, the Defendant was driving CM6 vehicles at the section of about 10 km from the site of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul (hereinafter referred to as Dongdaemun-gu) to the front of Gangnam-gu Seoul.

Accordingly, the defendant violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement on the circumstances of a drinking driver, each investigation report (report on the circumstances of a drinking driver, blood appraisal results, report on detection), and written evidence of alcohol alcohol;

1. Control note;

1. Previous records before ruling: Criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (two times before sound records and two times), and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each summary order;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is three times or more of drinking driving. The circumstance that traffic offense has been violated, the circumstance that drinking water in this case has been considerably regulated, and the situation that the drinking water in this case has not led to an accident that is disadvantageous to the defendant, and the fact that the defendant has no record of being subject to punishment heavier than the previous fine in this case, etc., shall be considered favorable to the defendant, and the punishment is determined as ordered in light of various sentencing conditions shown in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc.