logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.05.11 2015고단3795 (2)
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On March 15, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for a crime committed by the Ulsan District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on September 11, 2013.

[2] The facts constituting the crime under B is the representative director of D with limited liability in Daegu-gu, and E is the person who takes charge of the order and sale of the goods from the above company without charge, and the defendant is the person who takes charge of the payment of the goods from the above company.

The Defendant and B and E received lectures from the Victim F Co., Ltd. to sell ‘dumping’ at a price lower than the supplied price and conspired to receive the sales proceeds in cash.

E On February 2, 2014, in the vicinity of the four-distance radius in the Seocho-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the head of the department of the victim company's Daegu-gu business office G "The leader of the victim company's Daegu-gu business office (hereinafter referred to as "the leader of the institute to provide real estate as security") will pay the accounts by the end of the month following the transaction day.

“.......”

Accordingly, around February 10, 2014, the Defendant and B and E purchased H building 501, 220,000,000,000 won under the name of the company D with limited liability, and on the 13th of the same month of the same month, the Defendant and B offered the price for the goods as security by establishing a mortgage of the maximum amount of 20,000,000,000 won with respect to the above real property to the victim company, and entered into a

However, the above real estate provided as security by the Defendant, B, and E is worth KRW 120 million if the security value is deducted from the security deposit amount to KRW 100 million, and D was not paid in from the beginning. The Defendant, B, and E were dumped at a price lower than the supplied price after receiving the goods from the victim company and sold the goods from the victim company and paid the sales proceeds in cash, and some of them were paid in cash, and the Defendant, B, and E were thought to be used individually by the Defendant, B, and E, and the goods were supplied from the victim company.

arrow