The punishment of defendants shall be four months in prison.

The execution of a sentence shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 20, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 03:35, at the D cafeteria located in C (A, 52 years of age) in C (B) in Seoul, the Defendant was unable to avoid a small amount of disturbance for one hour, such as, under the influence of alcohol to female customers, a mother of the name he was taking meals, fluences about alcohol, and leaving the cafeteria outside of the cafeteria with the hands of the cafeteria; and (b) C was unable to normally respond to the restaurant customers.

The Defendant interfered with the victim C’s restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Application of C’s written laws and regulations

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, which provides for the legal provisions on criminal facts;

1. Determination of a suspended sentence under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Recommendation type of sentencing criteria: Imprisonment with prison labor for up to one year and six months;

2. Decision of punishment: to recognize errors;

There are four criminal records of fines, such as interference with business affairs.

It is not good to find out again after the police officer was called out.

However, the degree of interference seems not severe.