logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.05.29 2014고단9374
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Basic Facts] The Defendant’s wife provided a good appraisal to ordinary E due to the fact that his father’s wife D is facing the same anti-friendly E (n, 10 years of age). On October 24, 2013, around 20:00, the Defendant gave lessons to E on the road in front of the apartment guard room in which he resides, and caused her son’s son’s sonm.

Defendant heard the above facts from C on the day of the instant case, around 09:00 on the following day, the Defendant called “C when the E her son was dead, and the contact point was known to the parents because they want to kill E.”.

After that, C was accused of assault from E’s mother G, and was convicted of an injury to the Incheon District Court on July 7, 2014, and was convicted of an assault on December 23, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

On September 2, 2014, the Defendant appeared in the court of Incheon District Court No. 317, which is located in the Nam-gu Incheon District Court of Law No. 317, and taken an oath against the above court as a witness of the injury case No. 2014Da44555 C, and testified to the effect that, although the Defendant called F to “C when he/she had her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

Ultimately, the Defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory as above, and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. A copy of the examination record of witness;

1. A copy of the witness examination protocol (A) [the defendant and his defense counsel shall not claim that the defendant called F to F with his phone call, and that it was false because C had no fact about her her her son at the time of her her son’s son. However, according to the witness F’s consistent statement, the above assertion shall not be accepted as it is recognized that the defendant told F to the effect that he was her her son’s phone number after he called to F

1. Relevant Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The order of provisional payment;

arrow