logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2018.07.18 2017나10211
부당이득금
Text

1. The part of the judgment of the first instance against the defendant shall be revoked.

2. The plaintiff's claim corresponding to the above revocation part.

Reasons

1. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings, the following facts may be acknowledged in each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 11 through 15, 18, 19 (including a serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply).

[Attachment 7] The establishment of mortgage-backed 103, 104, 204, 304, 404, 504, 801, 903, 904, 904, 904, 901, 904, 901, 106, 108, 101 through 70, 106, 108, 109, 109, 201 through 70, 207, 107, 200, 207, 200, 207, 200, 307, 207, 300, 207, 207, 300, 307, 307, 406, 50, 407, 506, 50, 407, 107, 207, 307,

B. From among the apartment units created the instant collateral security, the remaining apartment units other than those set forth in subparagraphs 801, 802, 901, and 903 of the same No. 101 among the apartment units set up in the instant collateral security have been rendered a compulsory auction decision on February 25, 201, and the above auction procedure was called "the compulsory auction procedure of this case".

Daejeon District Court No. 1967 delivered on March 2, 201, and received on March 2, 201.

arrow