logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.01.08 2013고단6988
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as a used vehicle broker, purchased a vehicle delivery fee of KRW 25 million in the name of the victim Ebenz E in the victim D name on June 12, 2012 upon request from the victim D and transferred the above delivery money from F on the following day.

For this reason, the victim D is the same

7. 24. Around 24. A theft report, the Seoul Dongdaemun Police Station seized the said vehicle, and the total of 23 documents related to the said vehicle and the vehicle (such as a collateral security agreement, a vehicle transfer certificate, etc.) was temporarily returned to the victim D.

1. At around 16:00 on December 27, 2012, the Defendant: (a) confirmed that the victim D was temporarily returned the said vehicle from the above police station investigator in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Dongdaemun-gu; and (b) the victim’s “Ig, whether I would have to be able to make up for tax calculation of the amount of money converted from this fraud; and (c) the victim’s “Ig, Ig to face Ig to face Ig to face Ig to face Ig to face Ig to face Ig to face Ig to face Ig to face Ig to face Ig to face Ig to face Ig to face Ig to face Ig to face Ig to face Ig to face Ig to face Ig to face Ig to face Ig to face Igre on the part of the victim

2. Special larceny Defendant: (a) stated in the foregoing paragraph (1) on the date, time, place, and the key of the said vehicle was kept by G (a disposition of suspending prosecution on the same day) and said vehicle was parked in the said parking lot; (b) thereby, G driven the said vehicle by using the said key.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property together with G.

3. The Defendant used a stolen victim’s letter of contract to establish a right to collateral security on the said passenger car without the consent of the victim, such as forging a private document, uttering of a falsified investigation document, electronic records, etc., and any false entry, public electronic records, etc.

arrow