logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2014.12.22 2014고단743
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등
Text

1. Crimes No. 2-A and B of the Decision No. 2 as to Defendant A, and No. 1 of the Decision and No. 2 of the Decision

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On December 18, 2012, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment for 2 years of suspension of execution and 80 hours of community service order in August of the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc. in the Daejeon District Court’s Incheon District Court’s Branch, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 5, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Defendant A, Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant D, and Defendant E’s joint criminal conduct are married couples operating a mutual game room of “K” in the Asan CityJ, and Defendant C is an employee of the above game room. Defendant D and Defendant E are employees of the above game room.

No game products related business entity shall allow any person to gamble or perform other speculative acts using a game product, or leave such person to do so.

Nevertheless, from June 8, 2012 to March 11, 2014, the Defendants established 125 games in the said game room, including “refrating expenses”, “spawn”, “spawn”, and “Sastland”, and had many and unspecified customers use the games, and if they request the settlement of points obtained through the games from customers, the Defendants provided 500 won 50 won 500 won chil (i.e., “al., one (ii) or 100 won chil (i.e., one (ii) or one (iii) chil (i.e., one (iv) with the points 500 points 50 points 500 points 100 points 50 points 500 points. Since the above points keeping certificate was in the form of a bearer bond certificate, the holders could thereafter exchange it in cash in the said game room, or freely sell and exchange it with other customers.

As a result, the Defendants conspired in collusion to allow customers who found the above game site to engage in gambling and other speculative acts using game products, or to leave them to do so.

2. Defendant A

A. On June 7, 2012, the Defendant altered a private document, which was duly formed between the lessor L/M and the lessee N in an insular area (hereinafter referred to as “Asan-si”).

arrow