1. Of the judgment of the first instance, KRW 10,369,291 jointly with the Defendants and the Plaintiff from December 3, 2014.

The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is that "4.(c) future treatment costs" in the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows.

Paragraph 2(b) of the same section.

Except as mentioned above, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance.

(A) If evidence Nos. 1-2, 3, 5-2, 5-3, 14-2, 14-3, 2-2, and 14-2, and 14-2, and the testimony of witness F of the first instance trial added the purport of the entire pleadings, the Plaintiff may be found to have occurred due to the failure of Defendant C, who is not Defendant B, operating the Defendant Council member, to fulfill the necessary duty of care in the process of giving him/her a beer care to the Plaintiff, and did not take follow-up measures, such as immediately transferring he/she to a superior hospital, even though he/she flows out outside of his/her blood. On the other hand, the Defendants’ assertion denying the occurrence of liability for damages on a different premise can not be accepted. Meanwhile, considering the purport of oral arguments as to the whole, it is reasonable to exclude the possibility that the Plaintiff’s treatment of the instant case, including the Plaintiff’s first-class hospital’s treatment room and the first-class hospital’s treatment room, and the possibility of the Plaintiff’s treatment in the instant case.