A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be returned to the victim C.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On July 27, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Seoul Central District Court on July 27, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Ansan Prison on October 31, 2013, and was in a state of lacking the ability to distinguish things from things or make decisions due to physiological evidence at the time of the following crimes:

【Criminal Facts】

around 14:40 on March 19, 2014, the Defendant habitually stolen the property owned by the victims eight times from around the following day to July 29, 2014: (a) the Defendant: (b) the victim E working for the victim in Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul; (c) the victim’s cash 80,000 won owned by the victim; (d) the 400,000 won or more of the market price; and (e) the flabdum 21 cost, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 500,000,000,000 won; and (e) the Defendant habitually stolen the property owned by the victims, as described in the attached list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Second-time protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each written statement of C, G, H, I, J, K, E, and L;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Handbag photographs, seized articles, CCTV photographs at the scene of occurrence and the victim's hand;

1. A report on internal investigation (related to the verification of CCTV at the place of occurrence, the verification of a suspected victim's crime and the escape habits, the verification of CCTV at the scene, the investigation of victims and the scene of occurrence), investigation report (the investigation of tracking of a suspected victim and attaching photographs of a crime);

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal records and investigation reports (A relevant to the search of prisoners and attachment reports of written judgments);

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the repeated crimes of the same kind in the judgment;

1. Article 5-4 (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. The proviso to Article 35 and the proviso to Article 42 of the Criminal Act among repeated offenders;

1. Article 10 (2) and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of mental disorders;

1. The sentencing guidelines are applied to the crime on the grounds of sentencing in Article 333(1) of the Refund Criminal Procedure Act.