The defendant's KRW 1,560,000 and its 5% per annum from June 10, 2020 to November 25, 2020 to the plaintiff.

1. Summary of the plaintiff's assertion

A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant came to know from around 2017 that the branch office of the Korea District Heating Corporation came to know as the workplace rent.

B. Around August 2019, the Defendant notified the neighboring person of false information that the Plaintiff damaged the Defendant’s clothes, threatened the Plaintiff’s handure, and threatened the Plaintiff that “I will not leave the Plaintiff by mobilization of early bombs.” On the computer used only by the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the Plaintiff was allowed to prepare a search language booming the Plaintiff’s appearance on the computers used only by the Defendant, let the Plaintiff look at, and booming the Plaintiff’s living room used only by the Plaintiff and the Defendant. During the process of the Plaintiff’s head, the Defendant committed a tort that infringes on the Plaintiff’s personal rights by causing sexual humiliation or aversion in the workplace, such as price of the Plaintiff’s head.

C. In addition, on October 2019, the Defendant left the Plaintiff’s mobile phone area of KRW 1,560,000, which was cited by the Plaintiff, into the ground and committed an illegal act damaging the Plaintiff’s mobile phone.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff a sum of KRW 1,560,000 equivalent to the market price of a mobile phone, KRW 38,440,000, and KRW 40,000.

2. Determination

A. According to Gap evidence No. 7, the defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 700,000 for the crime that the defendant destroyed the plaintiff's 1,560,000 won, which was cited by the plaintiff on the ground of the 1,560,000 won, while he/she brought about a dispute with the plaintiff at the first floor of the Korea District Heating Corporation C branch office on October 23, 2019. The defendant is liable to compensate for damages of KRW 1,560,000 which are equivalent to the above market price of the plaintiff's mobile phone due to the above tort.

B. However, with respect to the assertion of tort, such as the remaining assault, intimidation, and harassment in the workplace of the Plaintiff’s assertion, the following circumstances acknowledged by the respective descriptions of evidence Nos. 2 and 15 and Nos. 4, i.e., the Plaintiff and the Defendant are not good between them.