Case Number of the previous trial
early 2012 Heavy 4440 ( December 17, 2012)
Title
It is that all advertising expenses other than the advertising expenses paid by the institute of major issues shall be free of charge and the advertising expenses paid in a monthly publication in which it is published shall be deemed non-designated donations
Summary
In addition to the advertising expenses paid by the institute of major issues, all advertisements other than the advertising expenses are published free of charge, and the space of the institute of major issues is not more than 1/6, 1/12 of the Foundation, but only the institute of major issues pays advertising fees, the advertising expenses are not determined as non-designated donations, but as non-designated donations.
Related statutes
Article 34 (Non-Inclusion of Donations in Necessary Expenses)
Cases
Seoul High Court 2014Nu58701 ( November 26, 2014)
Plaintiff and appellant
door-○
Defendant, Appellant
○ Head of tax office
Judgment of the first instance court
2014.06.26
Conclusion of Pleadings
oly 22, 2014
Imposition of Judgment
November 26, 2014
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The Defendant’s global income tax for the year 2009 against the Plaintiff on July 2, 2012
23,670,480 won, local income tax of 2,367,040 won for year 209, global income tax of 2010
Each disposition of imposition of KRW 107,204,420, and KRW 10,720,440 for local income tax for year 2010 shall be revoked.
Reasons
The reasons for this court's decision are as follows: 16 '46,145,738 '6 '46,738 '5 '6' among the facts found in the judgment of the court of first instance' '360,00 '360,000 '' '23,756,39 '2' '17 '14,146,149 '13,440 '18 '6,427,635 '6,635 ' '18 ' '101,550 '', '15,131,978 '' '19 ' '18,616,920 ''' '10,300 ' ',00 ' ',00 ' ',00 ' '19 ' '19 ' '6,920 '
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and it is so decided as per Disposition.
Judges
Justices Cho Jae-hoon, et al.
Judges Jeong-○
Judges Lee Dong-○