logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.09.30 2016고정850
폭행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 8, 2016, at around 15:06, the Defendant expressed that the victim E (36 years, inn, inn) was using and sleeping off this slicker within the digital data room of the C Library located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, the Defendant used the victim E (36 years, inn) and committed assault by taking the victim's slick hand over once as plastic water disease.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. A report on investigation (verification of shots);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order (the defense counsel of the defendant asserts that the defendant's act is a legitimate act that does not violate social rules.

However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the defendant, although the defendant demanded the victim who uses the capital to use the capital in the library, the victim refused the above demand, while the defendant and the victim have sexual intercourse between the defendant and the victim, the fact that the damaged person caused the victim's hump to report the defendant's humf to the victim by taking the victim's humf, and the victim's humf was caused by the victim's humf.

In light of these developments of the violence, the motive or purpose of the defendant's act is justified, or the means or method is not deemed reasonable, and it is a legitimate act that does not violate the ordinary rules and regulations.

[.]

arrow