logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2014.12.18 2014구합64681
정보공개거부처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

. Details of the disposition; and

A. The Plaintiff is a person who manufactures and distributes game products after completing the registration of the business of producing and distributing game products pursuant to Article 25 of the Game Industry Promotion Act (hereinafter “Game Industry Promotion Act”). The Defendant is an institution established pursuant to Article 16 of the Game Industry Act in charge of matters concerning the classification of game products and the post management thereof.

The platform: The existing level of PC/online game: The main contents of the report on modification of contents by juveniles - The sea level of the screen is changed from 1280*768 to 768 to 768*1280, compared with the existing contents - UI and UI will be added or location of UI and UI will be changed, and the screen will be carried out separately from the original background of the word "7 marks of the card" on the back side of the card, which will be changed to 1280*768 to 1280.

B. In order to produce and distribute a game product in the Republic of Korea, a rating classification shall be obtained from the Defendant, and in the case of a game product already rated after the change of the contents of the game, a rating maintenance disposition shall be obtained from the Defendant after filing a report, and if a report is returned, the game product in question cannot be distributed any more. If the report is returned, the Plaintiff partially changed the contents of the game product in the call forum, bus 2-NP-1012-04 (hereinafter “instant game product”). On June 2, 2014, the Plaintiff reported the content revision to the Defendant as follows.

C. As a result of the 23th rating meeting on June 11, 2014, the Defendant determined that a revised report on contents of the instant game product was a matter of significant change in the method of use and provision compared to the existing game. Accordingly, pursuant to Article 9-2(3) of the Enforcement Rule of the Game Industry Act, where a revised report on contents of the game product as classified has been returned, and where a revised report on contents of the game product was returned, Article 21 of the Game Industry

arrow