Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant accepted the proposal that he will pay the premium when he will deliver a car and a intentional accident by driving the Oral Ba, and C, while driving a car to D, which was known to the general public, would have caused an intentional accident on the one-way traffic road (to use the Oral Bato without fault) and would have caused an accident by driving the car on the one-way traffic road, and would have caused an accident to be done intentionally by driving the car to the insurance company, and B conspired to receive the insurance money by claiming the excessive repair cost of the damaged Oral Ba, false sirens, etc.

On April 11, 2014, at around 15:32, the Defendant is waiting to drive a unregistered BMWK 1600 GTL 1600 GTL on the one-way road near the intersection of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul, 62-2, the increase of Seodaemun-gu.

The EM5 car driving by D with the signal of departure from B waiting in the surrounding building, and the contested as a public contest, has intentionally conflicted with the EM5 car driving.

D At the site, KB damage insurance phone, which is a victim, received insurance as if the accident occurred.

Accordingly, on April 14, 2014, the personal damage agreement amounting to KRW 990,000 from the victim’s account at Defendant’s post office account, and the same year

4.21.Otour Repair Costs 9,940,000

5. 30. 30. Payment of 52,320 won for medical expenses and 10,982,320 won for Franchisium to Franchisium, thereby obtaining insurance proceeds by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Copies of each police interrogation protocol against B, C, and D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the documents to be submitted by the insurance company for criminal facts (KB damage insurance);

1. Article 347 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;