logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2019.10.17 2019구합5483
행정정보공개청구거부처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 24, 2017, the Plaintiff filed a request for disclosure of information with the Defendant “from April 1, 2017 through April 10, 2017 to April 10, 2017, as well as a copy of the register of receipt of appraisal records requested to be appraised with the legal toxic chemical department of the National Science Investigation Institute, and from June 1, 2017 to June 30, 2017, including the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant information”).

B. On November 30, 2017, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the statement that “the Defendant does not produce the register of appraisal receipt and the document of receipt of the request for information disclosure, and manages it online by means of the appraisal receipt and processing register of the appraisal information management system and the information disclosure processing register of the information disclosure system (hereinafter “appraisal receipt and the information disclosure processing register managed online”). Data other than the subject of information is prohibited from being disclosed to others pursuant to Article 19 of the Personal Information Protection Act, but only the information about the party can be disclosed at the time of the Plaintiff’s request for information disclosure.”

(hereinafter referred to as "the disposition of this case". (c)

The Plaintiff filed an objection against the instant disposition with the Defendant on December 28, 2017, and the Defendant, on January 4, 2018, is called the “Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Information Disclosure Act”) with the Plaintiff on January 4, 2018.

Since it is not possible to raise an objection against the notification of existence of information pursuant to Article 18(1), the plaintiff's objection shall be treated as a petition and quality, and explained to the plaintiff on April 4, 2017. ① copy of the report on the results of preliminary examination of narcotics, etc. on two copies of the receipt number of the Do Police Agency (2017-S-3229) of the report, and ② copy of the output of the received information on the receipt number of the Do Police Agency (2017-S-3229) through the inquiry of the appraisal receipt department, which can identify the information requested to be appraised by the plaintiff.

arrow