1. The defendant shall pay 89,508,900 won to the plaintiff and 15% per annum from September 9, 2016 to the day of complete payment.

1. Details of ruling;

A. The Plaintiff’s status as the Plaintiff is Ulsan-gu B, C, and D (hereinafter “each of the instant lands”; the individual land is specified by the method of “instant No. 0” and its owner using the numbers indicated in the table below, and operated the E agency from the building on the ground.

(b) Project approval and publication - Project name: F Project name in 2014 (after this, the project name has been changed to the F Project name in 2015): Public Notice of Ulsan Metropolitan City on April 17, 2014 - Project operator G announced on April 17, 2014 - Defendant:

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s adjudication on expropriation (hereinafter “instant adjudication”) - The date of expropriation of each of the instant land - The date of expropriation: The compensation for losses: The “evaluation amount” as stated in the table below (hereinafter “instant compensation for losses”): The same shall apply to each of the following appraisal corporations (hereinafter “instant compensation for losses”): The central appraisal corporation, a stock company, and an appraisal corporation: The sum of the appraisal value in the HB B B (23,618,002 Cand 8762,652,138,203 Dand 464,953,100,920,920,709,709,709,700 and the sum of the respective written adjudication on compensation for losses related to the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s total amount of compensation for losses, 608,705,781,706,700 and 2008,705,781,757,700 and 2006,75,700.

among them, 1,537,797,000 in aggregate (18,750,000)

D. On December 10, 2015, the Defendant deposited KRW 1,537,797,000 with the Plaintiff as the principal deposit, upon the Defendant’s refusal to receive the said compensation for losses.

(Reasons for Recognition) The fact that there is no dispute over the Ulsan District Court No. 5014. [No. 5014.] of 2015, each entry of Gap evidence No. 2 through 5, the purport of the whole

2. The Defendant’s judgment on the Defendant’s main defense does not seek an increase in business compensation at the time of the Plaintiff’s filing of the lawsuit, as of May 25, 2016.