The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On June 14, 2017, the summary of the facts charged, the Defendant: (a) was aware that the said vehicle was a vehicle with a large amount of repair costs of KRW 18,874,090 due to a traffic accident; (b) but, despite the knowledge that the said vehicle was a vehicle with a large amount of repair costs of KRW 18,874,090 due to the traffic accident, the Defendant obtained a false statement from the victim E that “a minor accident is deemed to replace the site of the lower part of the driver’s seat because it was insufficient to see and operate the vehicle and replace the site of the lower part of the driver’s seat due to the shock of the vehicle, and that the vehicle was a vehicle with a large amount of repair costs of KRW 16,80,00,000 from the damaged person for the payment of the vehicle.”

2. Determination

A. The Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the instant vehicle was a minor accident while selling the instant vehicle to the victim.

There is no other fact, and otherwise asserts that the present vehicle is not sold with the intention of deceiving or deceiving the victim.

B. The following circumstances acknowledged through each evidence duly adopted and investigated in this court, namely, ① the Defendant was awarded a successful bid on the online auction site operated by F Co., Ltd., and the Defendant did not know about the issue of the air bags and licensing operation of the instant vehicle, and there was no fact that the Defendant was notified to the Defendant. ② Before selling the instant vehicle, the Defendant issued the Defendant a record of inspecting the performance and condition of the instant vehicle to the victim, and the said record was indicated in the postline, the donth, the donth, the dar, and the dony panel, and ③ the Defendant did not notify the victim of the insurance processing power of the instant vehicle, but it appears that the victim himself could have sufficiently confirmed it. ④