1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B’s KRW 5,466,498 and its related thereto from April 4, 2015

B. Defendant C shall be KRW 5,466,498 and also

1. Facts of recognition;

A. A apartment complex (hereinafter “instant apartment”) is a collective housing complex on the ground of 16,313 square meters (hereinafter “H land”) in Young-gu, Busan Metropolitan City, and is composed of 416 households in total and 12 households in total, consisting of 416 households in apartment buildings and 12 households in total.

B. For the management of the apartment of this case, the Plaintiff is an autonomous resolution body consisting of the representatives of occupants, such as apartment building owners. Defendant B is the 101, Defendant C is the 102, Defendant D is the 104, Defendant D is the 105, Defendant E is the 105, Defendant F is the 106, the 106, the 103, the 103, the 103, respectively.

C. A part of H’s land, which is the site of the instant apartment, was incorporated into a road site of “J Construction Work,” which is an urban planning facility project implemented in Busan Metropolitan City on October 30, 2013. Accordingly, H’s land was subdivided into a total of 449 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) including KS-gu, Busan, and 435.8 square meters and 13.2 square meters, etc. from the Busan, Young-gu, Busan, and was expropriated.

In the instant land, electric facilities, including water tanks and transformers, and children’s playgrounds (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant obstacles”) have been installed.

E. The apartment of this case had undergone a pre-use inspection on November 30, 2004, and the registration of ownership preservation was completed for each partitioned building on January 3, 2005. Of the apartment of this case, the part on the ground of the apartment of this case was constructed separately from the building of apartment building and the building of the commercial building. However, since the underground floor of the commercial building was constructed on some underground of the apartment complex used by the sectional owner of apartment building, the share of the apartment site and the share of the building site of the commercial building are not separately registered. As to H land which is the site of the apartment of this case, the ownership registration was completed by shares after determining the ratio of the site ownership by combining both the sectional owner and the sectional owner

F. The Plaintiff purchased a new site and thereby.