The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the court below's imprisonment (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the circumstances such as the defendant's time to commit the instant crime, the fact that the court below was tried and agreed with some victims, and the degree of damage caused by theft and fraud is not hot.

However, according to the fact that the defendant has repeatedly committed a crime within the short period, many victims have been generated, and has been punished several times for the same crime, and that he was punished for repeated crimes even at the time of the crime of this case, it is reasonable to punish the defendant with strict punishment.

In full view of the above circumstances and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the overall sentencing conditions indicated in the records, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, even if it is considered that additional written agreement was submitted in the appellate trial.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.