logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2020.07.21 2020가단50630
대여금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The fact that the Plaintiff deposited KRW 20,000,000 on July 27, 2010, and KRW 15,000 on August 11, 2010 into the account under the name of each Defendant C may be acknowledged pursuant to the purport of each of the entries and arguments in subparagraphs 5-1 and 2, and all of the arguments.

The plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff lent 20,000,000 won to the defendant C by promising to pay interest of 4% per month on July 27, 2010 on the lending of 20,000 won to his her her her friend-gu with 5% interest on the lending of 1,00,000 won to her friend-gu and 4% per month on July 27, 2010, and again, it would allow the defendant C to receive interest of 5% per month on the lending of friend-gu to his friend-gu friend-gu friend-gu friend-gu friend-gu friend-gu friend-si friend-si fri-si friend-si fried-si fried-si fried-

In light of the following facts and circumstances revealed by each statement of the aforementioned adopted evidence, Eul-6 through 8 (the number of pages is included; hereinafter the same shall apply) and each purport of the entire pleadings, i.e., ① the Plaintiff’s commission of the construction of housing to Defendant B, and deposit the money in Defendant C’s account several times in addition to the aforementioned money as the construction cost, ② the Plaintiff and Defendant B living together for eight years, and did not demand the Defendants to return the loan during that period; ③ the Plaintiff was deposited in the Plaintiff’s account in the name of Defendant C after the time when the Plaintiff asserted the loan; ③ the Plaintiff was deposited in the Plaintiff’s account in a considerable amount of money from the Plaintiff’s account in the name of Defendant C after the time when the Plaintiff asserted the loan; and there was no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow