1. The Defendant revokes the decision to dismiss a request for review filed by the Plaintiff on November 28, 2016.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff was a company engaged in plastic-related manufacturing business, and around 2010, provided services for model use conducted by the Korea Electric Power Corporation after developing the cryp local ground plates and the cryp local ground plates, which are the equipment to prevent the cryp to the utility poles from putting them out on the nes.

B. On April 27, 2012, the Korea Electric Power Corporation: (a) held a deliberation committee on the utilization of electric power distribution lines for the purpose of analyzing the results of pilot use for more than 14 months; and (b) deliberated on whether the facilities developed by the Plaintiff are used as lighting equipment or materials; and (c) rejected it on the grounds of facility performance issues.

C. On February 13, 2014, the Plaintiff requested the Korea Electric Power Corporation to use an additional model for facilities developed by the Plaintiff, and the Korea Electric Power Corporation decided to re-verification the performance by using the model for approximately 25 months from April 2014 to May 2016 only on the cryptoptoptoptoptoptos among facilities developed by the Plaintiff, and used it as model.

On July 25, 2016, the Korea Electric Power Corporation held a steering committee for power distribution equipment and analyzed the results of the additional model use over 25 months, and deliberated on whether the plaintiff has used the additional model use, etc., but "the creation of dunes repeatedly at some places as a result of the on-site demonstration for two years, creation of dunes repeatedly at some places as a result of the on-site demonstration, and there is no function of avoiding

“A decision not to additionally use” (hereinafter referred to as “decision not to additionally use”) was made on August 9, 2016, and notified the Plaintiff on August 9, 2016. (e) On September 28, 2016, the Plaintiff revoked the decision not to additionally use the Korea Electric Power Corporation and takes corrective measures to enable the Plaintiff to additionally use the Korea Electric Power Corporation’s landmarks developed by the Plaintiff from the Korea Electric Power Corporation branch.

Article 46(1) of the Board of Audit and Inspection Act and Article 6 of the Rules on the Examination of the Board of Audit and Inspection. However, on November 28, 2016, the Defendant filed a request for examination to the Plaintiff for determination.