The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is too unfilled and unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the Defendant was conducted for seven weeks after entering the Marine Corps in 2011, and was placed on behalf of the Defendant. However, the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes on or after July 201 while serving as public interest service personnel from around September 2011. The Defendant raised the Defendant from the time of each of the instant crimes on or before the few months before the occurrence of the instant crimes, and the appearance of the Defendant, who had been the highest will of the Defendant, died, is found to have committed each of the instant crimes without controlling the awareness of sexual obscenity and its nature, and the Defendant was found to have committed each of the instant crimes under the control of sexual humiliation and its awareness. According to the evaluation and recommendation by the probation office, the Defendant’s sexual intercourse is likely to be suspected through each of the instant crimes, and thus, it is difficult for the probation office to take measures for treatment and treatment of young children to have a view that it was necessary for the examination and supervision of sexual impulses to meet the necessary psychological pressure of the instant crime, and thus, it is difficult for the Defendant to view that there is lack of risk and apprehension of treatment.