A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] The Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 300,000 as a crime of injury at the Suwon Flag Flag on September 14, 2007, and on November 23, 2015, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million as a special intimidation in the support of Flag Flag Flag Flag Flag, and on September 19, 2016, issued a summary order of KRW 1 million as a crime of assault in the support of Flag Flag Flag Flag, and is five criminal records of violence, such as the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million as an assault.

[Criminal facts] The Defendant and the victim D (35 tax) were related to sexual intercourses from November 1, 2014, and they were living in Gyeyang-gun E from August 14, 2015.

In this regard, while living together with the victim, the victim did not work but lived only with the income of the defendant. Accordingly, even though the defendant arranged the lease deposit (tax) or motor vehicle owned by the victim and requested several times to help the defendant, the victim first borrowed money to the defendant, the victim was refused to lend money, and the victim later refused to lend money to the defendant, so the victim conflicts with each other as a monetary problem.

During that period, the Defendant used excessive materials to threaten the victim or assault the victim to injure himself/herself (an order of KRW 1 million, such as a special intimidation, etc., issued on November 23, 2015). On September 10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) while driving the victim on a Franter car in the vicinity of Yangyang-gun Transfer-gun, on the road near which he/she is driving on, and driving the victim on, a Franter car, the Defendant provided money to the victim; (b) on the ground that the victim refused it, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim due to the number of days of treatment when the victim’s face and body cannot be said to have been taken back on the side of the drinking and sprink.

2. The Defendant, at around 08:00 on October 5, 2016, talked with the victim and the victim’s residence as a matter of money at the victim’s and the victim’s residence, did not gather the details of the Defendant’s agricultural account transaction. However, the Defendant refused to do so.