logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.09.08 2017고단1185
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of nine million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a motor vehicle BV in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from dangerous driving).

On March 22, 2017, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration below 00:42, while under the influence of alcohol level during blood, and led the Defendant to drive the said vehicle in front of the DNA telecom in Northern-gu C, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu at a dived speed from the flaping on the flap level to the flabing level.

In this case, there was a duty of care to safely drive a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle by accurately manipulating the steering room and the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle and accurately manipulating the steering gear, etc.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and opened a red light on the face, opened a crossing, walked, and walked, which makes it difficult to drive normally due to the influence of drinking such as drinking, and led the victim E-driving F, which stops on the right side of the driving direction due to the negligence, and led the left side of the vehicle behind the vehicle to the right side of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc., in need of two weeks’ treatment due to occupational negligence.

2. On March 22, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of alcohol measurement) driving a motor vehicle accident under the influence of alcohol, such as: (a) on the roads in front of the DNA cartels located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu; (b) on March 22, 2017, where the accident occurred, as described in paragraph (1); (c) E, the other party to the accident, was designated as the Defendant as the driver; (d) the Defendant was engaged in drinking; (c) the Defendant was engaged in reding, smelling the Defendant’s face; (d)

A police officer's demand for the measurement of drinking alcohol by inserting four minutes from around 01:06 on March 22, 2017 to around 01:38 of the same day on March 22, 2017, who was dispatched after receiving a traffic accident report due to a reasonable ground to determine a person, shall avoid the demand for the measurement of drinking alcohol without justifiable grounds, even though he/she has received a demand for the measurement of drinking alcohol for about 32 minutes from around 01:06 to

arrow