Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

On October 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 10:30 on the racing-si, the office of the association branch office of the racing D, which was located in the racing-si, and (b) on the ground that the victim E, the head of the office of the association, did not create documents, such as the minutes, and (c) told the victim E, who was the head of the office of the association, and (d) took the front line of approval on the book at his hand, and carried out the injury, such as the fluoral seat, and the fluoral seat, which requires treatment for about two weeks, by putting about

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F and G;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the head of a complaint and an injury diagnosis report;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. The Defendant, based on the same date, time, and place as the above facts constituting the crime, destroyed the victim’s face when determining the victim E’s face on the same ground as the above facts constituting the crime, by lowering the cell phone worth of KRW 994,400 at the victim’s market price.

B. The defendant-appellant

A. For the same reason, at the same time and place as Paragraph (1), one monitor owned by the D Association was removed from the floor, thereby damaging the market value of KRW 230,000.

2. We examine whether the defendant had a criminal intent to commit property damage against mobile phones and monitor damage as stated in the above facts charged. Each entry in the E’s legal statement, accusation statement, police statement protocol, and recording record of the board of directors, which seems consistent with this, in light of the legal statements of the E, E, and F, it is difficult to believe it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it (in particular, in the case of monitoring damage itself, even if it is based on the above facts charged itself, there is a criminal intent to commit property damage to the defendant, since it was written by E with assault and separated monitoring from the floor, and thus, it was intended to commit property damage to the defendant.

subsection (b) of this section.

In addition, the defendant assaults E.