1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendant are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff A is a person born between the deceased D (hereinafter "the deceased") on April 5, 1965 and E, and the plaintiff B was born between the deceased and another woman on August 16, 1964 but was reported as born between E and the deceased as a legal spouse at the time of the birth.

B. On August 20, 198, the Deceased divorced from E on August 20, 198, and married with the Defendant on September 5, 198.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 and 2's entries, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant operated a restaurant while living together with the deceased and running a restaurant. From around 1987 to around 1988, the defendant forced the plaintiff B to have sexual intercourse with the customers.

In addition, the defendant abused the dog, etc. to the plaintiff A, and assaulted the plaintiff A by inserting it together with the deceased who did not comply with it.

The Defendant: (a) had an interest in a female who is an employee of the deceased; (b) had the Plaintiff A (at that time, during the third year of middle school) rape; and (c) had the said employee raped.

Plaintiff

B’s act coerciond by the Defendant as above and depended on alcohol without suffering from mental suffering due to the living environment, the Defendant forced the Plaintiff B to be hospitalized into a mental hospital five times from December 24, 2007 to July 11, 201.

The plaintiffs suffered irrecoverable damages due to the above tort committed by the defendant, and the defendant first seek payment of KRW 20 million, which is part of the amount of damage.

3. We examine whether the defendant committed a tort as alleged above by the plaintiffs.

Accordingly, the testimony of Gap 6, 8, 10, and 11, and the testimony of the witness E and F is difficult to believe, the remaining evidence of the plaintiffs' submission is insufficient to recognize it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

4. Thus, the plaintiffs' claims against the defendant are without merit.