A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 20, 2016, the Defendant purchased F forest land of KRW 15,769 square meters in 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

“A false statement” was made.

However, in fact, the Defendant intended to use the above real estate as security even if it was provided by the injured party as security, and did not have any intent or ability to pay the balance of the above real estate until November 20, 2016, after offering it as security to the steel company and receiving steel supply.

Nevertheless, on May 23, 2016, the Defendant: (a) obtained the establishment of a mortgage equivalent to KRW 180,000,000,000,000 for the maximum amount of a claim against G, which lent KRW 50,000 to the Defendant on May 23, 2016, by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim; and (b) obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and H:

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a real estate sale contract, an application for registration of creation of a collateral security, a certified copy of a real estate registry, a cash storage certificate, a performance statement, an investigation report (Submission of A transaction details), and an investigation report (Submission of H transaction details);

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is not good, the fact that there are records of having been punished several times for the same criminal records, the fact that the defendant confessions the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant is against himself/herself while making an agreement with the victim, and other consideration of the amount of claims in G;