logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2020.02.12 2019고단1006
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 16:00 on September 16, 2019, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force for about 45 minutes, such as her daily activities and city expenses, while drinking, and continuously playing a meal on the table table. The Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force.

2. On September 16, 2019, the Defendant continued to enter the place of obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) around 16:45, at the same time; (b) the police officer E and security guards belonging to the Masan District Police Station D police station, who was called for a 112 report that the Defendant was under influence of alcohol, and the police officer E and security guards of the Masan District Police Station: (c) demanded him/her to break out of the house and return home; and (d) the circumstances leading up to the request, E and the Defendant Ha sold, and (e) took a bath view that the Defendant “I Y Ha, I Ha, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am am on the floor and am on the bridge, and continued to do so by assaulting Defendant F.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police with respect to C and F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning internal reports and CCTV closure photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 314 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The instant crime was committed even during the period of suspension of the execution of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which led to the instant crime.

a police officer.

arrow