logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2019.08.13 2019고단838
주거침입등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Criminal facts

Some of the facts charged were corrected.

The Defendant is teaching prior to the towing around 19:00 on March 4, 2019.

In order for the victim to meet the victim in front of the door of the building D, Osan-si, a residence of the victim B (V, 39 years of age), he opened the door door at the victim's above residence and entered the gaps generated out of the door into the victim's residence, thereby infringing on the victim's residence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of B and E;

1. Application of field photographs, caps of text messages (57 pages of investigation records) and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (a favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing as follows) are teaching prior to the preliminary review in 2012.

Although there was a history of having been sentenced to imprisonment due to criminal facts, such as rape and injury of the above female upon finding the victim's residence in the middle of 2 months, the victim did not abandon the victim's residence and waited for before the victim's residence without the victim's consent, and assaulted the victim by hearing the horses "at home" from the victim who arrived at the victim's residence at the late later, and taking the victim's body after going through the victim's movement.

The main circumstance is that the defendant shows an attitude to recognize and reflect the defendant's mistake, and after the prosecution of this case was instituted, the defendant does not want the defendant's punishment by agreement with the victim, and the defendant is not aware that there is a man who is a new counsel with the victim, and the above male comes from the victim's residence.

arrow