beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Criminal facts
around 17:30 on March 14, 2014, the Defendant applied the “D” sales office located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, to the victim E, F, and sales commission, and applied the face of the victim E (the victim South and the age of 57) to the victim E, who walked in a water course and walked in a water course for about 5 weeks, with approximately 6 weeks face of the victim E (the victim E, South and the age of 57) who continued to walk in a water course, for approximately 5 weeks of treatment. The Defendant added the victim F (the South and 48 years old) face of the victim E (the victim E, who continued to walk in a water course, to the victim F, who is in need of approximately 6 weeks of treatment.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
2. Statement by the public prosecutor with regard to the F;
3. Statement of the police officer to E;
4. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each injury diagnosis certificate and investigation report (No. 15 No. 15).
1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crimes;
2. The reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes are the elements for sentencing unfavorable to the Defendant, such as the following: (a) the Defendant committed a serious injury, such as depression or the bones of salkes, by causing the victims of an influence violence; and (b) the Defendant had been punished several times in the past.
On the other hand, most of the facts charged of this case are recognized by the defendant, and since the sales commission expected by the defendant was not received for a long time, it may be considered as the motive for the crime of this case. The fact that the defendant recently deposited three million won for the victims is an element for sentencing favorable to the defendant.
Furthermore, the sentencing guidelines as shown in the arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, were taken into consideration, and the sentencing guidelines formulated by the Sentencing Commission also refer to “colind