logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.03.10 2016고단2293
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be set forth in six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 8, 2010, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch, and the same court issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) on October 29, 2010.

Although the Defendant had had a force of driving under the influence of alcohol two or more times as above, on October 20, 2016, he again driven the B-hand car from around 3 km-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Yancheon-si to around 0.103% of alcohol concentration among the blood transfusion around 22:30 on October 20, 2016 to the road of about 6:86-25, the Defendant driven the B-hand car from around 3km-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement report on the situation of a driver who is in charge of driving and the ledger on the use of drinking instruments;

1. References to inquiries, such as criminal history, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports (examination of suspect criminal history);

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order and the order to attend lectures are as follows: (a) Defendant again committed the instant crime even though he had the record of punishment for driving under drinking two or more times; (b) Defendant’s blood alcohol content was significant at the time of committing the instant crime; (c) Defendant’s criminal records; (d) Defendant’s criminal records; (e) Defendant’s criminal records; and (e) Defendant’s criminal records; (e) Defendant’s criminal records; (e) not causing traffic accidents; (g) it is clear that social relationship was not caused to his family members; and (e) Defendant’s detention appears to involve excessive difficulty for his family members; and (g) Other

arrow