logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.02.21 2016구합73405
소득금액변동통지처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiff is a corporation specialized in the expressway and airport road packing construction, and B is a representative director of the plaintiff from July 12, 1997 to the date of July 12, 1997.

B. The Defendant conducted a tax investigation on the Plaintiff’s business year 209 through 2013 (hereinafter “instant business year”), and confirmed that the Plaintiff received the processed purchase tax invoice of KRW 6,024,078,390 (the amount excluded from value added tax; hereinafter “the processed purchase amount”) from 15 companies, including Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Purchase”) during the instant business year, and included it as construction cost, and did not include the total of KRW 3,335,135,449 (hereinafter “the additional cost”) in the cost of labor cost, wages, etc., and did not include the cost of KRW 3,35,135,49 (hereinafter “the additional cost”) in the account book. The Defendant denied the amount of the processed purchase expense of the instant case, and deemed that the amount of KRW 2,770,740,3310, the amount of bonus income accrued to the Plaintiff for the year 205, 209, 209, 2005.

(A) The amount of bonus disposal (C=A-B) 1,091,040, 300, 931, 931, 193, 193, 070, 150, 230101, 655, 405, 359, 93, 410, 410, 305, 359, 410, 410, 305, 307, 307, 397, 397, 397, 390, 497, 205, 130, 201, 750, 40, 4040, 547, 397, 397, 205, 197, 205, 205, 196, 305, 197, 397, 390 (no disposition)

C. The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed an appeal with the Tax Tribunal, but was dismissed on June 1, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] There is no dispute.

arrow