1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

3.Paragraph 1 of the text of the judgment of the court of first instance.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into each comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to B cargo vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) with respect to A haloged vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicle”).

B. Around 14:40 on February 7, 2015, the Defendant’s vehicle waiting in the two-lanes of the west Culture and Arts Center in front of the Hanam Culture Center, which led to the intersection of the Hanam Culture Center in front of the Hanam Culture Center, in order to make a right-way at the two-lanes of the Hanam Cultural Center, and making a right-way at the two-lanes of the Hanam Culture Center, running along the three-lane from the back of the Defendant’s vehicle, and going through the three-lanes from the back of the Defendant’s vehicle, and intending to make a right-way at the right-hand side of the Defendant’s vehicle, which was parked at the right-hand side of the Hanam Culture and Arts Center in front of the Hanam Culture Center, and shocked the part on the left side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, which

(hereinafter “instant accident”). C.

On February 26, 2015, the Plaintiff paid KRW 5,572,00 as the repair cost for the Plaintiff’s vehicle due to the instant accident.

[Based on recognition] The items of Gap evidence 1 to 6, Eul evidence 1 to 6 (including paper numbers), the purpose of the whole pleadings and arguments

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff is obliged to pay the plaintiff the full amount of the above insurance proceeds paid by the plaintiff in relation to the accident of this case and the compensation for its delay since the plaintiff is obliged to pay the plaintiff the full amount of the above insurance proceeds paid by the plaintiff in relation to the accident of this case and the compensation for its delay because the accident of this case caused the plaintiff's vehicle's total fault in violation of the designated lane and driving instruction mark on the wind that the defendant's vehicle, the point where the accident of this case, which is the point where the accident of this case, is the point where the accident of this case, reaches the traffic signal without flickeringing the direction direction on the left side

As to this, the defendant is above the defendant's vehicle.