1. For the plaintiffs:

A. Defendant C, Defendant D, Defendant E, Defendant F, and Defendant G are separate lists.

1. Claim against Defendant C

A. Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the arguments in Gap evidence No. 4, Gap evidence No. 11-2, and Eul evidence No. 1 as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiffs agreed on October 27, 2017 that the tenant Co., Ltd. may terminate the lease agreement until October 22, 2020 with the real estate listed in the separate list (hereinafter "the real estate of this case") owned by the plaintiffs to the defendant Co., Ltd., Ltd., by designating the lease amount of KRW 2,200,00 for the lease deposit of KRW 20,000,00 for the lease deposit of this case without the plaintiffs' consent or the lease deposit of KRW 20,00,00 for the lease deposit of this case to the tenant Co.,, Ltd., Ltd. to transfer the lease right of this case to the defendant Co.,, Ltd., Ltd., and at the same time, the plaintiff transferred the real estate of this case to the defendant Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd. for the above reasons that the lease agreement was transferred to the defendant Co. from 284.

According to the above facts, the lease contract between the plaintiffs and the defendant C was terminated due to the exercise of the plaintiffs' right to terminate.

Therefore, Defendant C is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiffs as a result of the termination of the lease agreement.

B. As to the Defendant C’s assertion, Defendant C Co., Ltd.’s assertion suffered damages equivalent to KRW 70,000,000,000, such as electricity cost of KRW 202,000,000 for the goods within the building of KRW 200,000,000 for the former lessee H, on the wind that the ceiling of the building of the instant real estate was collapsed (i.e., KRW 200,000 for the goods in the building of KRW 200,00 for the former lessee H).