logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.10.12 2018고단2418
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On December 30, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won for a crime of violating road traffic laws at the Ulsan District Court on December 30, 201, and a fine of five million won for the same crime at the above court on April 12, 2017.

【Defendant, as seen above, has violated the provision on prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol twice or more, and once again, the Defendant driven a B le-car with the alcohol concentration of about 0.09% from the public parking lot located in the 3-dong, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-ro, about July 24, 2018 to the road 21-ro, 258 at the center of the same time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of regulating drinking driving, making a statement on the situation of a driver driving, reporting on the detection of any violation of road traffic laws, notification on the results of regulating the driving of drinking, and cutting down CCTV images at the location of a driver driving under drinking;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of an inquiry letter, investigation report (the same kind of force) and other relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 148-2 of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, the selection of a fine, and the selection of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order constitutes three-way driving of alcohol due to the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; however, there are no criminal records other than the criminal records as indicated in the judgment 2; the degree of alcohol concentration in the blood of this case is not so high that the distance of driving of alcohol is shorter than the distance of driving of alcohol due to the high level of alcohol; and the Defendant repents the error in depth.

arrow