All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. In order to secure the claim for the construction cost of the grounds for appeal, Defendant A: (a) occupied the F Building Nos. 503, 701 in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; (b) exercised the right of retention; and (c) at the same time, all the claims group including the Defendants, including the Defendants exercised the right of retention against the whole building; (b) as part of the exercise of the right of retention, the Defendants removed and entered the locking equipment Nos. 602 and 1111 in the instant case as indicated in the judgment of the court below; (c) but the court below convicted the Defendants of the facts charged of the instant case.

2. The lower court acknowledged the following circumstances based on the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court: ① from July 28, 2009, J occupied and occupied K by leasing No. 602 to K, and sold it to the victim on July 12, 201, and the victim occupied and occupied the above building on or around July 15, 201; ② from October 10, 2004, L occupied and occupied M by leasing No. 1111 to M from Oct. 11, 204, and sold it to the victim on May 8, 201, and occupied it by the victim on or after taking over the above building from early June 201, 201; ③ the victim took possession of the above building No. 602 and No. 1111, and the Defendants removed the entrance door door and removed it from each of the above Defendants’ damages, and the Defendants’ assertion that each of the above Defendants’ right of retention was without merit.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.