logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.04.22 2015고단644
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 22:50 on October 2015, the Defendant, as a company member, was a substitute engineer, who d, a worker, who d, who dices alcohol together in front of the C convenience store located in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju, and caused a substitute engineer and a vision as a matter of agency fee.

In addition, the Defendant: (a) tried to arrest D as a flagrant offender by the police officer F of the Gwangju Mine Police Station E (a police station) who was dispatched to the said place after having reported the face of the above acting engineer; and (b) tried to arrest D as a flagrant offender, the Defendant interfered with the police officer’s arrest of F in the act of assaulting F, by putting the F’s breath, by drinking the breath of 3 to 4 times by taking the breath of breath, by taking the f’s breathm with the breath of crop by hand, and assaulting F on one occasion by walking the part of F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Optional fine;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act: The reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act; the accused is against the instant crime; there is no record of crime against the accused; and the accused appears to have caused the instant crime by contingency under the influence of alcohol. - The instant crime is not deemed to have been committed by the Defendant by assaulting a police officer on duty in the face of uniform to interfere with his official duty.

arrow