logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.02.19 2013고정6712
일반교통방해
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A and D are the chairperson of the F Trade Union affiliated with the EM (hereinafter referred to as the “EM”) and Defendant A is the dismissed member of the G trade union affiliated with the above EMM.

Defendant

At around 15:00 on August 31, 2012, A and D participated in and gathered together with the “Resolution for the Countermeasures against the Total Force of E Workers,” hosted by the Emination of Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, and began to go through the emination of 1,300 members of the Emination of the Emination of the Emination of Labor Force, and came to go into the emination of the emination of the emination of the emination of the emination of the emination of the emination of the emination of the Emination of Labor Force, and came to go into the emination of the emination of the emination of the emination of the emination of the emination of the emination of the emination of the emination of the emination of the emination of the H (hereinafter “H”).

Accordingly, the defendant A and D interfered with the traffic of the land in collusion with the participants in the above assembly.

2. Defendant B and Defendant C are the members of the J-non-regular branch of the H (hereinafter “H”), and Defendant C is the president of the said I-U K branch of the said I-U.K.

Defendant

B around 15:00 on August 31, 2012, around 15:00, he participated and gathered in the '8,31 plenary session held by H' in the Seoul East-gu Seoul East-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Steering Committee, and started with 8,000 members of H union and started with 8,000 members of H union, and was in common 1 in the Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, through the subspathical street Ri and the Bank of Korea street Ri, and opened with 16:40 from 16:40 to 17:40 on the day before the department store, he occupied the roads of eight-lanes from the above 8,00 persons to the 17:40.

Accordingly, Defendant B and C interfered with the traffic of the land in collusion with the participants in the above assembly.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Statement of information status report;

1. The description and image of photographic materials (A);

1. Entry and video of documentary evidence photographs (Defendant B, C);

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. The defendant C's partial statement 1.

arrow