logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.09.28 2017고정313
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On April 16, 2017, the Defendant driven the above-mentioned vehicles around 12:37, and led the D front-distance intersection from the luminous Eup to the breadth of the container wharf from the luminous Eup.

Since the location is a private distance intersection where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to safely drive the driver in accordance with the traffic signals by living well the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front part of the first car driving by the Defendant as the victim E, who was driving to the left at the opposite lane due to the negligence of violating and proceeding the signal at the intersection.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim F, the victim F, and the same victim G, who were on board the above victim E by occupational negligence, for approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Evidence and photographs of the traffic accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In light of the fact that the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Provisional Payment Order is not the same kind of Defendant, but the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of suspension of execution, and that the Defendant’s negligence is not less and less specific, even if considering personal circumstances, such as the Defendant’s environment and disability, the sentence of the said fine is inevitable (the amount of the fine specified in the

arrow