logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.08.28 2014나58469
퇴직금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff A shall be modified as follows:

The defendant shall be 3,376.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following part, and therefore, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. On the 4th 11th 1st th 1th am of the first instance judgment, the phrase “A 1, 2, 3, and 24 (including each number)” is amended to read “A 1, 14, 2-2 through 9, 11, 12, 14 through 19, 3, and 1, 24-1, 24 of the evidence of the first instance judgment.”

The Labor Standards Act shall be amended to "the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits" in the fourth, fourth, fourth, and seventh, fourth, and fourth, fourth, and seventh, all of the judgment of the court of first instance.

Part 6 pages 1 and 2 of the first instance court's decision "A 2 through 23, 25 through 32, and 10 Evidence of Eul (including each number)," shall be amended to "A 2 through 23, 25 through 34, 37 through 44, 2, 2, and 10 Evidence of the second instance court's decision (including the number of pages; hereinafter the same shall apply)".

Part 6, 3 and 4 of the first instance court's decision "A, 5, 13, 19, 20, 24 through 30, 41, 45, and 48 (including various numbers), and witness R testimony" shall be corrected "B, 13, 24 through 30, 40, 45, 52 through 55, 58, 63 through 66, 68, 69, 72, witness of the first instance court, and witness of the first instance court," respectively.

Part 7, 10, and 11 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deleted from the content of the debt collection agency's expense burden, and shall be amended to "the defendant's expense burden has been deleted."

Part between 7 and 9, at the bottom of 8th court rulings of the first instance shall be amended as follows:

“B) The Defendant directed the debt collector to extend work or Saturday work, set up a concentrated work hours to prohibit the visit during the pertinent hours, and ordered the site visit to more than a certain number of times, and demanded permission or report when visiting the site during the working hours.

In addition, the office is assigned to some debt collection sources to the office or the office is passed through the computer network.

arrow