logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2017.09.21 2016가단24293
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a legal entity that operates a Gacheon Hospital (hereinafter “ro hospital”), which is a medical institution, and the Plaintiff is a person who undergoes ear surgery at a roadside hospital.

B. On July 3, 2013, the Plaintiff was diagnosed with scopical and scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic and scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic and scopic scopic scopic scopics

C. Since then, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in a roadside hospital on August 27, 2013 and discharged on September 9, 2013 due to the aggravation of pains caused by the surgery in the course of receiving a regular outpatient treatment at a daily intervals, but the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the roadside hospital on September 9, 2013, and was discharged on December 16, 201 after being hospitalized again on December 9, 2013.

On February 21, 2014, the medical personnel of the roadside Hospital recommended all of the hospital to be the annual-household hospital, which is a superior medical institution, for the purpose of the surgery treatment to the Plaintiff, as the Plaintiff refused to provide medical treatment at the roadside hospital, without the improvement of the Plaintiff’s dysium for the surgery.

E. However, from March 5, 2014 to April 17, 2014, the Plaintiff received medical treatment from a member of a private hospital B, who is not a superior medical institution. On May 7, 2014, the Plaintiff was diagnosed at the Macheon National University Hospital as having lost the right side of the Plaintiff, and was hospitalized at the Macheon National University Hospital on July 3, 2014, and was subject to scambling on the left side.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 5, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s judgment on the cause of the claim was negligent in failing to conduct the tracking inspection at all for six months, which is the minimum tracking period after the instant surgery, and as such, due to the negligence by the medical staff of a roadside hospital, the Plaintiff’s Cheong-do medical staff, is liable to compensate the Plaintiff’s damages due to the decline of Cheong-do medical staff.

arrow