The judgment below

Of them, the part against Defendant A shall be reversed.

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

except that this judgment.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The first instance sentence of the Defendants is too unreasonable.

(b)the sentence of the first instance court of the Prosecutor is too uneasible and unreasonable;

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances revealed in the records of this case and arguments at the first instance court and the trial of the party, namely, it is difficult to see that there are many prices for good offices, regardless of the low amount of money received (the public prosecutor asserts that the amount of money received is a large amount, and thus the amount should be determined in an aggravated sentencing criteria, but whether the money or goods received is not a large amount shall not be determined solely on the pretext of accepting the money or goods, or on the basis of absolute amount, disregarding the practices of corruption in political rights, and even after the commencement of an investigation, the donor has returned all of them after the commencement of an investigation. However, there is no previous criminal record, not only before and after the commencement of an investigation, but also after the exclusion of the imposition of a fine by embezzlement at around 198, in light of the legal attitude, there is no one subject to punishment; the implementation of the punishment; the defendant has already been placed in detention for 37.5% of the sentence of the court below; the defendant's business (operation in small electricity and fire fighting corporations) and his neighboring organizations; the reason and circumstances that the public prosecutor may not participate in the aforementioned sentencing guidelines.