1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and decision of the court of first instance are justifiable even if the testimony of the witness K at the court of first instance submitted at the court of first instance, and the testimony of the witness K at the court of first instance

Therefore, this court's reasoning is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for the addition or modification of the following parts and the part claimed by the plaintiff, which is emphasized by this court, as stated in paragraph (3). Thus, this court cites it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of

An abbreviationd name established in the judgment of the first instance is also used below the same.

2. - Part 2, 14, - Part 2, 14, - Part 3, 3, 3, 14, -, 3, 3, 4 of the first instance court's decision "the 90% or more was completed", - Part 16, 3, 3, 16 of the first instance court's decision "the defendant added "the testimony of a witness of the first instance court" to 3, 21 of the first instance court's decision "the 5, 10, 5, 5, 5, 5, - only "Evidence is recognized" - Each entry of evidence 8- 1, 3, and 8- 1, 8- 3, 3, and 3's fact inquiry results of the first instance court's inquiry into C corporation of the first instance court's decision," and most of the defendant returned to the plaintiff, such as removal of the remaining materials, etc. on December 28, 2015."

3. Additional judgment;

A. The plaintiff's assertion asserts that the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff KRW 12,707,200 to the separate appropriation amount (safety launch plate, hardware, etc.) in accordance with the terms and conditions of the instant lease agreement.

B. According to the evidence stated earlier, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to include the safety launch plate in separate terms and conditions of the instant lease agreement and the provisional and miscellaneous articles for civil engineering purposes in separate terms and conditions, and the said miscellaneous articles.