logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.10.11 2013고단2319
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B Poter cargo vehicles.

At around 15:40 on May 23, 2013, the Defendant proceeded at approximately 10km each hour at the speed of 10km from the customs office of the Republic of Korea in accordance with the first way to the customs office of the Republic of Korea from the territory of the Republic of Korea (U.S.).

Since there is a crosswalk where a signal, etc. is installed, it was confirmed whether a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive according to the new subparagraph, after checking whether there is a person who will cut the way by reducing the speed and by properly examining the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and continued to proceed at the same speed while the vehicle driving signal was changed from the yellow to the red, and the part of the victim C (the age 11) who walked on the left-hand side of the above cargo vehicle to the right-hand side of the cargo vehicle in line with the signal, was placed on the front-hand side of the cargo vehicle in line with the signal, and was placed on the front-hand side of the victim D (70 years old), which was crossinged in the same direction as the above C, without operating the brakes accurately, without operating the brakes, due to the yellow-down and failing to operate the operation of the brakes, and followed the speed ped on the upper-hand side of the above cargo of the victim D (70 years old), which was crossinged in the same direction as above C. Even though the vehicle signal was a stop signal, the Defendant passed the crosswalk and received the rear cargo of the victim E (the victim E (the age 56 years old) who was parked on the front-hand side of the above cargo.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the victim C’s occupational negligence with injury to the victim C, such as saved saved saved saved saved saved saved saved saved saved saved saved saved saved saved saves, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of E, C, and D;

1. The report on traffic accidents (the actual survey report);

arrow