The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On May 30, 2014, the Defendant sent a letter of facts charged to E, “Absent or F representatives are in good faith, and property is not easy to be deducted,” to E, within the D office where the said Defendant is working, for the purpose of slandering a person, by revealing facts openly through an information and communications network, with a view to slandering a person.” However, the Defendant sent a letter of “Absooooooox, which is a smartphone-rating pattern, to E, within the D office where the said Defendant is working, Nam-gu, Gwangju.”

From June 5, 2014 to June 15, 2014, the Defendant disseminated the same text to 20 persons, E, etc., and disclosed public facts through information and communications networks, thereby impairing the reputation of the victim F.

2. Provisions of applicable Acts to charged facts in the market: Judgment dismissing the victim's intention not to prosecute on October 20, 2014, which is the case after the prosecution is instituted under Article 70 (3) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act).