logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.05.30 2012가합12795
손해배상(기)
Text

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff A 28,625,898 won, the plaintiff B, and C 19,971,145 won, and each of the above amounts.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The deceased E (hereinafter referred to as “the Deceased”) is a person who runs the removal work in the trade name “F” from May 25, 2005, and the Defendant is a person who runs the transportation business in the trade name “H” registered in the name of the wife G, and is engaged in the operation and equipment operation of the ICO (tentative name scarj; hereinafter referred to as “the instant vehicle”).

On September 22, 2011, the Deceased leased the instant vehicle with the Defendant, who is a driver of the vehicle, through the K Association Director L, while performing the removal of the class of the third floor of the building located in the Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

Accordingly, if the deceased and M moved wastes to the complaint work unit installed on the instant vehicle through the windows on the third floor of the above building, the defendant operated the above complaint work unit, and moved wastes to the cargo vehicle waiting on the front side of the instant vehicle into the cargo vehicle, the defendant again made the complaint work unit that M used in the instant vehicle to transport wastes by using the complaint work unit installed on the instant vehicle.

At around 07:35, the Deceased and M Ma moved 20-30 Mabru 20-30 g of waste from the third floor of the above building to the complaint work unit of the instant vehicle, and M Ma was on board the complaint work unit. At the time, the Deceased was able to resist the Defendant’s work attitude, etc. while the Deceased was at a fluor’s fluor who supported the complaint work unit of the instant vehicle, and the Deceased was fluor who was on board the complaint work unit and died at a height of 5.8 meters.

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant accident”). As the wife and children of the Deceased, the Plaintiffs succeeded to the property of the Deceased, the Plaintiff A, the Plaintiff B, and C, respectively, 2/7 shares.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, 6, 11, 12, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5.

arrow