All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The punishment sentenced by the court below against the defendant (the punishment amounting to five million won) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below against the defendant is too unfortunate and unfair.

2. The crime of this case is a situation unfavorable to the Defendant, where the Defendant spreads the content that “the Defendant shall not vote because he plans the ballot counting,” prior to the 19th presidential election, thereby interfering with the elector’s participation in voting, and at the same time publicly announcing false facts for the purpose of preventing the E candidate from being elected, and the nature of the crime and method of committing the crime is inferior. The Defendant’s crime is likely to interfere with the elector’s freedom to participate in voting and interfere with the elector’s fair and reasonable judgment on candidates for election, thereby impairing the fairness and transparency of election.

On the other hand, the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected his mistake, and the defendant did not have a large number of electors who viewed the defendant's Face Broadcasting, thereby having a significant impact on the result of the election.

It is difficult to see, and the fact that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment for the same kind of crime is favorable to the defendant.

위와 같은 사정들과 그 밖에 피고인의 나이, 성 행, 환경, 범행의 동기, 수단과 결과, 범행 후의 정황 등 변론에 나타난 모든 양형조건 및 대법원 양형 위원회 제정 양형기준의 권고 형량 범위 ◈ 법률상 처단형의 범위: 벌금 500만 원 ~ 3,000만 원 ◈ 양형기준의 적용 허위사실 공표로 인한 공직 선거법 위반죄 [ 유형의 결정] 선거 > 허위사실 공표 ㆍ 후보자 비방 > 제 3 유형( 낙선목적 허위사실 공표) [ 특별 양형 인자] 없음 [ 권고 영역 및 권고 형의 범위] 기본영역, 벌금 500만 원 ~ 1,000만 원 선거의 자유 방해로 인한 공직 선거법 위반죄:...