Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a year and six months and by a fine of KRW 1,500,00.

The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal records] The Defendant’s written indictment on May 12, 201 is a clerical error in writing in the indictment written on May 12, 2011.

On April 14, 201, after being sentenced to four months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud in the assistance in the development of the Suwon method, it was sentenced to two years and eight months of imprisonment for a crime of violation of the Punishment of Tax Offenses Act at the Suwon method Board, and on April 30, 201, the parole period was expired on September 19, 201 when the execution of the sentence was released on April 30, 2013 in the Ansan prison.

[Criminal facts] 2017 Highest 788

1. On June 2016, the Defendant’s fraud against the Victim B was found in a furniture production factory operated by the Victim B, and the Defendant paid 50% of the price for the commencement of the construction of the cryp cryp and the cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp

“The Agreement was agreed.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any particular property at the time of concluding the construction contract with the victim, and even before and after receiving the construction cost from the owner, etc., only a part of the construction work was proceeded and there were many persons punished by using the construction cost for personal purposes, and even at this time, the victim was required to do construction work and the defendant thought to use it as living expenses, etc. from the owner, and there was no intention or ability to pay the construction

On June 30, 2016, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) caused the victim to install a 17920,000 won and a new juncing house in Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si; and (c) caused the victim to acquire pecuniary benefits equivalent to the construction cost due to the failure to pay the construction cost.

"2018 Highest 64"

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act is a holder of DNA A8 car.

No owner of any motor vehicle shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance.

Nevertheless, the defendant's mandatory insurance on July 2, 2014 is mandatory insurance on the 3rd Gyeong-dong-dong-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si.