logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.10.11 2013고단3438
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates a marina club in the area B and the second floor in Suwon-si.

No one shall engage in the conduct of arranging sexual traffic, such as arranging, soliciting or inducing sexual traffic or providing a place for sexual traffic.

Nevertheless, from the end of December 2012 to May 15:30, 2013, the Defendant: (a) had his employees D, etc. found in the above marina club from the customers who had been employed by him from the end of December 2013 to the end of May 8, 2013, received commercial sex acts amounting to KRW 70,00 or KRW 100,00 as the price for commercial sex acts; and (b) provided guidance for sexual intercourse into the above marina club.

Accordingly, the defendant conspiredd with the above D to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act and selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. In light of the fact that the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “the Criminal Procedure Act”) under Article 334(1) includes the necessity of strict punishment in that the defendant committed the instant crime during the period of suspension of execution, there is no criminal history of the same kind of crime, the business size of the defendant is not significant, and the defendant recognized as a crime, and instead of determining the punishment, the court shall order the defendant to provide community service for the provision

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

arrow